Search for: "Beneficial Mutual Savings Bank v. 50"
Results 1 - 5
of 5
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2011, 6:36 am
Claudia told Bob Egelko of the San Francisco Chronicle that the bank was nice enough to contact her attorney the day before the sale to offer her the chance to save her home by agreeing to a higher monthly payment. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 12:24 am
As a common law principle, the banking sector has long functioned under the value of confidentiality, largely embodied in the famous 1924 United Kingdom decision, Tournier v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
These types of conflicts, of course, are not unprecedented.[23] For example, U.S. courts for many years have had to determine whether to enforce (via contempt citations) U.S. grand jury subpoenas seeking documents, despite claims by the recipients of those subpoenas that compliance would violate foreign laws, such as bank secrecy laws.[24] Some decisions have rejected arguments that it is “unfair to require the [recipient of the subpoena] to be put in the position of… [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
The missing metrics of sustainability: just how beneficial are benefit corporations? [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 9:43 am
The law formerly only applied to employers with 50 or more employees but was expanded under Senate Bill No. 778, approved by the governor of California on August 30, 2019. [read post]
